Welcome to Our Research Archive
Search and filter by content type, issue area, author, and keyword
- ✕ Clear Filter
- Adam J. White (1)
- Angela Rachidi (38)
- Beth Akers (25)
- Brent Orrell (68)
- Bruce D. Meyer (9)
- Charles Murray (1)
- Daniel A. Cox (9)
- Edward J. Pinto (13)
- Edward L. Glaeser (3)
- Frederick M. Hess (35)
- Howard Husock (69)
- Ian Rowe (12)
- James Pethokoukis (15)
- John Bailey (2)
- Joseph Fuller (2)
- Kevin Corinth (39)
- Kyle Pomerleau (7)
- Leslie Ford (8)
- marie cohen (1)
- Mason M. Bishop (2)
- Matt Weidinger (56)
- Matthew Continetti (1)
- Max Eden (2)
- Michael Barone (1)
- Michael R. Strain (13)
- Naomi Schaefer Riley (48)
- Nat Malkus (10)
- Nicholas Eberstadt (4)
- Paul Ryan (2)
- R. Glenn Hubbard (2)
- Ramesh Ponnuru (5)
- Richard Burkhauser (7)
- Robert Cherry (5)
- Robert Doar (12)
- Robert Pondiscio (13)
- Ross Douthat (2)
- Ryan Streeter (5)
- Sally Satel (1)
- Samuel J. Abrams (7)
- Scott Winship (39)
- Stan Veuger (4)
- Timothy P. Carney (14)
- Tobias Peter (18)
- W. Bradford Wilcox (48)
- Yuval Levin (8)
November 30, 2023
Evaluating the Success of the War on Poverty Since 1963 Using an Absolute Full-Income Poverty Measure
Abstract We evaluate progress in the War on Poverty as President Lyndon B. Johnson defined it, which established a 20% baseline poverty rate and adopted an absolute standard. While the official poverty rate fell from 19.5% in 1963 to 10.5% in 2019, our absolute full-income poverty measure—which uses a fuller income measure and updates thresholds…
November 30, 2023
Evaluating the Success of the War on Poverty since 1963 Using an Absolute Full-Income Poverty Measure
Abstract We evaluate progress in the War on Poverty as President Lyndon B. Johnson defined it, which established a 20% baseline poverty rate and adopted an absolute standard. While the official poverty rate fell from 19.5% in 1963 to 10.5% in 2019, our absolute full-income poverty measure—which uses a fuller income measure and updates thresholds…
October 17, 2023
Understanding Poverty Measurement
COSM scholars and AEI affiliates include some of the nation’s foremost experts on poverty measurement. On October 17, COSM gathered several of these scholars to provide a primer on opportunity in the United States. Angela Rachidi began by exploring the meaning of poverty, outlining the most fundamental decisions in measuring it and describing how different…
September 12, 2023
Measuring Poverty: The New Census Estimates and the Future of Poverty Measurement
Join AEI’s Center on Opportunity and Social Mobility for the release of the Census Bureau’s 2022 income and poverty estimates. AEI’s poverty experts will break down the numbers and discuss what they mean for the United States’ economic well-being. Then, they will discuss the state of poverty measurement and how it can be improved in…
April 1, 2023
Minimum Wages and Poverty: New Evidence from Dynamic Difference-in-Differences Estimates
Advocates of minimum wage increases have long touted their potential to reduce poverty. This study assesses this claim. Using data spanning nearly four decades from the March Current Population Survey, and a dynamic difference-in-differences approach, we find that a 10 percent increase in the minimum wage is associated with a (statistically insignificant) 0.17 percent increase…
August 23, 2021
Policies to Help the Working Class in the Aftermath of COVID-19: Lessons from the Great Recession
By Richard V. Burkhauser, Kevin C. Corinth, and Douglas Holtz-Eakin Abstract The COVID-19 pandemic and the associated government-mandated shutdowns caused a historic shock to the U.S. economy and a disproportionate job loss concentrated among the working class. While an unprecedented social safety net policy response successfully offset earnings losses among lower-wage workers, the risk of…
July 2, 2021
Addressing the Shortcomings of the Supplemental Poverty Measure
Key Points Read the PDF. Executive Summary The US Census Bureau publishes the Supplemental Poverty Measure (SPM) each year to provide important information on low-income Americans’ well-being. In early 2021, a National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM) panel formed to evaluate and recommend improvements to the SPM. To inform the NASEM panel and…