Skip to main content
Book Chapter

Fighting in-work poverty: the minimum wage versus in-work benefits

Edward Elgar Publishing

December 10, 2024

Abstract

We review evidence on the effectiveness of the minimum wage versus in-work benefit policies in reducing poverty in OECD countries. The most credible evidence suggests that raising the minimum wage is an ineffective policy tool for reducing poverty. On net, minimum wage increases tend to redistribute rather than reduce poverty. In contrast, government subsidies to people who work, through tax credits or transfers, can be appropriately targeted to households with low incomes and lift them out of poverty. Such policies also have the advantage of increasing labor supply, which can offset work disincentives inherent in means-tested benefits that do not require work. These policies, along with pro-growth policies that increase the demand for workers, can increase the household incomes of workers without the negative employment effects of minimum wage increases.

Doctor, Patient, and AI

October 5, 2026 | Brent Orrell

AI in health care promises greater efficiency, but only if it balances the objective knowledge of the physician with the subjective wisdom of the patient.

How Helpful Are Cash Payments to New Mothers Really?

October 4, 2026 | Angela Rachidi

Michigan has become an unlikely testing ground for debates over universal basic income programs. Since...

Can’t Afford a House? Try Getting Married.

October 2, 2026 | Arthur Gailes and Brad Wilcox

From right and left, we keep hearing how hard it is to afford a home....

Governor Sanders’ Medicaid Ad Is Realistic

October 1, 2026 | Kevin Corinth

Arkansas Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders released an ad this week about “Brad,” a fictional character...