Skip to main content
Book Chapter

Fighting in-work poverty: the minimum wage versus in-work benefits

Edward Elgar Publishing

December 10, 2024

Abstract

We review evidence on the effectiveness of the minimum wage versus in-work benefit policies in reducing poverty in OECD countries. The most credible evidence suggests that raising the minimum wage is an ineffective policy tool for reducing poverty. On net, minimum wage increases tend to redistribute rather than reduce poverty. In contrast, government subsidies to people who work, through tax credits or transfers, can be appropriately targeted to households with low incomes and lift them out of poverty. Such policies also have the advantage of increasing labor supply, which can offset work disincentives inherent in means-tested benefits that do not require work. These policies, along with pro-growth policies that increase the demand for workers, can increase the household incomes of workers without the negative employment effects of minimum wage increases.

Stranded by the Safety Net: Addressing Benefit Cliffs to Assist Families and Businesses

June 3, 2026 | Angela Rachidi

Chairman Ernst, Ranking Member Markey, and members of the Small Business Committee. Thank you for...

Poverty and Dependency in the United States, 1939–2023

June 3, 2026 | Kevin Corinth and Richard Burkhauser

In 1964, President Lyndon Johnson declared the War on Poverty. This set in motion the...

Pandemic Unemployment Fraud Data Continue to Amaze—and Not in a Good Way

June 1, 2026 | Matt Weidinger

On May 18, or more than 1,700 days after an alphabet soup of temporary federal...

Congress Shouldn’t Create Another Newborn Benefit

May 27, 2026 | Kevin Corinth

A bipartisan group of lawmakers recently introduced the Supporting Newborn Parents Act of 2026, which would...