Op-Ed
The Department of Housing and Urban Development has proposed the most dramatic low-income housing policy change in…
Op-Ed
The Harvard economist Raj Chetty, justly famous for his studies of the factors that enable upward mobility…
Blog Post
Facing public concern about high home purchase prices, the Trump Administration is said to be…
Op-Ed
If Americans have any shared image of public housing, it is one of dilapidated and…
Op-Ed
In 1983, Harvard scholars Mary Jo Bane and David Ellwood sought to determine the length…
Op-Ed
We hear a great deal about what’s called the black-white wealth gap. It’s not an…
Blog Post
At the height of the New Deal, with the Social Security Act, the Securities and…
Op-Ed
Americans like to call ourselves the most generous nation on earth — but charitable giving is…
Op-Ed
The late New York senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan long complained — and commissioned data — about…
Report
The federal government annually awards hundreds of billions of dollars in grants to states. In this report, I examine funding for the largest federal grant programs for 2020–22, focusing on grants-in-aid that do not fully adjust for population change. For states losing population, I calculate “avoided reductions,” the difference between the grants a state received in 2022 and what it would have received had grant funding been reduced proportionate to population loss. I find that the sums of avoided reductions differ greatly among states, with California, Illinois, and New York spared the most.
Op-ed
Earlier this month, an Oklahoma judge ruled that the City of Tulsa cannot be held legally or…