Skip to main content
Testimony

Lessons from the Unprecedented Fraud and Abuse of the Unemployment Benefits System During the Pandemic

House Committee on Education and Labor

September 21, 2022

Chairman DeSaulnier, Ranking Member Allen, and other members of the Subcommittee on Health, Employment, Labor, and Pensions, thank you for inviting me to testify at this morning’s hearing examining the administration of the Unemployment Insurance system. My name is Matt Weidinger, and I am a senior fellow and Rowe Scholar in poverty studies at the American Enterprise Institute. I previously served on the staff of the House Committee on Ways and Means, including for 15 years as the staff director of its subcommittee with jurisdiction over the nation’s unemployment benefits system.

Background on the unemployment benefits system

The nation’s Unemployment Insurance (UI) program was created in 1935 in response to the Great Depression. It remains a shared partnership between the federal government and the states—which generally determine eligibility for, the amount of, and the duration of weekly UI benefit checks.[1] The federal role includes providing states funds to administer benefits, as well as in recent decades legislating temporary federal programs offering extended benefits for those who exhaust up to 26 weeks of state UI checks. A permanent federal/state program called Extended Benefits (EB) was created in 1970; during the past two recessions that program was temporarily supported with 100 percent federal funds. States administer both state and federal unemployment benefits, and state payroll taxes paid by employers on behalf of covered workers support state benefit costs. A federal payroll tax supports the cost of permanent law federal responsibilities, including program administration and the normally 50 percent federal share of EB program expenses. Other federal costs, such as for the extraordinary benefits provided during the pandemic, have been supported with federal general revenue and added to the deficit.[2]

Read the full testimony here.

Comment on Proposed Rule Establishing Flexibility for Implementation of Work Requirements and Term Limits in Federal Housing Assistance Programs

May 1, 2026 | Kevin Corinth

Overview  The United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) posted a notice of...

Chicago’s “Disappearing Middle Class” Can Be Found in Its Proliferating Upper Middle-Class Neighborhoods

April 30, 2026 | Scott Winship

In a recent report with Stephen Rose, I argued that the narrative of a “shrinking middle...

How Policy and Demographics Are Reshaping SNAP: From Families with Children to Older Adults

April 29, 2026 | Angela Rachidi

Abstract The Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has grown substantially since the turn of the...

Understanding the Recent Declines in SNAP Participation

April 28, 2026 | Angela Rachidi

The number of people receiving food assistance through the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) has...