Problem
The earned income tax credit (EITC), available to low-income working families, phases out as earnings rise. Because the phaseout is based on family earnings, it creates a marriage penalty, such that many couples are better-off if they are unmarried than if they are married. This penalty disincentivizes marriage between parents, contributing to a high share of children being raised by single parents.
Solution
Replace the EITC with an hourly wage subsidy to low-income working parents based on individual earnings. Today, parents’ combined EITC amount is sometimes smaller if they marry because the credits are based on family earnings, and parents’ combined earnings may be too large to qualify for the maximum credit amount. The proposed policy would increase their combined subsidy if they marry because both married parents would qualify for the subsidy based on their individual wages, while only the custodial parent would qualify if they are not married.
Date of Proposal : June 29, 2023
Brad Wilcox, “Programs Should Put Family First,” Institute for Family Studies, June 29, 2023, Read more.
Brad Wilcox et al., Marriage Penalties in Means-Tested Tax and Transfer Programs: Issues and Options, US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Office of Family Assistance, October 2019, Read more.