Op-Ed
The holiday season offers a renewed sense of hope for many American families. But for…
Article
One of the central contradictions in American politics today is that, despite decades of measurable…
Article
An underappreciated trend in the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP)—formerly the Food Stamp Program—over the…
Op-Ed
Wisconsin’s 2025-2027 biennial budget includes several provisions aimed at improving the affordability of childcare in…
Op-ed
Allysia Finley is right to question the logic of allowing Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, or…
Op-Ed
Wisconsin state legislators recently introduced a series of bills to help working families across the state. Among…
Op-Ed
Hunger in the US is rising at an alarming pace – or is it? Last year’s…
Op-Ed
The United States has witnessed historic and escalating rates of obesity among adults in recent…
Op-Ed
On this day in 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson declared an unconditional war on poverty in America…
Op-Ed
A headline in the Wall Street Journal earlier this year read, “America Is Binging on Snacks,…
Op-Ed
In the coming months, Congress is expected to reauthorize the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP),…
Op-Ed
US safety-net programs already use work requirements to address potential work disincentives, and evidence suggests they increase employment and earnings among recipients capable of work. Critics often cite welfare-to-work experiments from the 1990s as evidence against work requirements, but the most relevant programs in those evaluations—“jobs-first” approaches that emphasized rapid employment—produced substantial gains in work and earnings. Although research on work requirements in programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program and Medicaid is more limited and subject to measurement challenges, broader evidence indicates that participation in safety-net programs can reduce employment incentives, implying that work requirements could offset those effects.